Additional Requirements : Emergencies
Version 0.3, 21 Aug 2011, Etienne Saliez
- Objectives:
- Expected additional requirements in the context of an
emergencies.
- Scenarios:
- Scenarios before the hospital:
- First aid on site::
- In general anybody should have a minimum of knowledge about
what to do as first aid and at least how and where to call for urgent
help.
- Emergency call:
- First person at the site of the accident:
- Should know how and where to call for support.
- In general anybody could be the witness of a cardiac
emergency and should have a minimum of basic knowledge. Hopefully there
is a nurse nearby or even a doctor.
- Basic "case" information:
- A minimum of information should be communicated to the
call center:
- The exact location of the patient and the context of
did happen.
- The main symptoms. A predefined checlist of questions
could help here.
- Observations
as pulse rate, blood pressure, consciensiouness level, if a cardiac
condition is suspected an ECG record, a picture of a wonded patient,
etc....
- Assuming that an electronic network is available,
the new
case should be immediately recorded once in the computer network and
made available to several involved actors as alocal doctor nearby,
ambulance staff, cardiologic center.
- Identification:
- A case has immediately a provisional "case
iidentification"
and can be retrieved by time, location, calling person, and maybe exact
patient identity if available.
- However the exact patient identification is perhaps not
yet available:
- If possible one will seek for an existing patient
record. If any an overview of known health problems could be
important
for the current care.
- Otherwise a new patient record will be created and
will keep archive of the current emergency event.
- Usually the initial recording will be initiated in the
network by the call center , but
anybody else could occasionally initiate an emergency case
record. The
other actors will continue to extend the information about the case.
- Role of the regional call center:
- Provisional
rough evaluation of the situation. Which type of problem? Which
kinds
of resources should be alerted first? Of course an overview of possible
care services should be always available.
- First aid recommendations.
- Coordination of the care, as sending an ambulance,
notification to the most nearby cardiologic center. who will try to
make a more precise assesment of the situation and recommendation for
the initial treatment e.g. defribrillation, etc...
- A very temporary role before taken over by a medical
center.
- Medical center:
- When receiving notification of the call:
- The medical center could already try to get more
information in order to make a more precise assessment, for example is
an ECG record can be transmitted.
- Could try to provide advices about what to do, for
example to use a defibrillator.
- Scenario of the emergency unit at the intrance of the hospital:
- Introduction:
- If not yet anticipated in the above scenarion, the case
registration is done here in a similar way as above. The common software
requirement of level "A"
are assumed to be already available in the hospital and the scenario
focus now on specific requirements related to an emergency department
at the entrance of a hospital.
- Missions:
- First aid in case of life threatening situations:
- A challenging medical situation: any
kind of medical problem can appear at any time, as well road accidents
as well
any disease.
- Moreover during night and week-ends the emergency
department
is also one of the few units inside the hospital, remaining fully
operational 24 hours a day.
- Very variable workload, hours with nothing to do but
sometimes at once several emergencies. A first look at the
arrival
define priorities. Patients with obviouly relatively minor
problems may have to wait several hours.
- Evaluation:
- Patient examination The emergency unit has a priority
access to technical services
- The doctor move between several patients, and come back
when the results of the first test become available, as lab, images,
etc .
- Triage:
- Decision about where the patient should go:
- Admission:
- Either admitted in the hospital after urgent measures
if necessary. For example trasferred to the surgery department.
- Discharge:
- Or reassurance of the patient advised to go
back at home and to be followed in the next days, by the GP and maybe
at the consultation of a specialist.
- At the same time simple care is provided here, e.g. a
prescription to be get in an external pharmacy, immobilisation of a
simple fracture, etc....
- The trend is that this kind of basic care is
increasing
to more than 80 %. Indeed GP become less available out of working
hours and patients hope better care in hospital. The latest point
is
not necessarily true. Anyhow patient going to hospital get as a
mean
much more expensive technical examinations, lab, XRays, etc... while a
GP with common sense and well knowing the patient can solve many
problems.
- Patient should leave the emergency unit as soon as
possible, in principle within less the 2 hours.
- Report:
- In all cases a report need to be available when tha
patient
leave the emergency unit, as well in case of transfert to a hospital
department as well if the patient is discharged as non urgent and
referred to external consultations. This mean that the
information
should be recorded directly on site, step by step, in such a way that
the record should always be closed when the patient leave, as far as
possible.
- Specific additional requirement for emergencies:
- Reuse of the common platform:
- The common software
requirement of level "A" are assumed to be already available.
- From the "Problem List" point of view an emergency call is a
new "Health Issue". The problem will have an evolution from a
rough "reason for calling" to a more precise medical definition.
For example the initial version could something like "patient in bad
condition found by the police", while the medical department will later
identify a precise diagnose, moreover which can be classified with an
ICD code from the WHO.
- Patient group:
- The patients and the cases the emergency unit is currently in
charge of. The patients actually present in the emergency unit,
as well new cases
just known via a call and expected to arrive soon.
- The common
Patient Group module should be extended as a kind of dashboard.
Indeed an emergency unit need to follow several cases in
parallel. Therefore they need a kind of dashboard showing the
current patient list with a short presentation of the most important
information.
The list should usually be sorted on emrgency level and secondarily on
time of arrival.
- The emergency unit must remain operational 24 hours a day:
- For many hours there are nearly no real emergency
patient.
However there is always some work, but mostly as primary care.
- In case of a catrastrophic event there could be far too
many. The question is then to identify qhickly the most urgent
ones and to sort the list according to urgency level.
- Dashboard:
- Motivation:
- The dashboard is used as a way to follow the evolution of
the group of emergency patients. The elements of this list
contain a short summary of every patient.
- It make easy to move from one case to the next one. A
click on this short summary provide a zoom into the full patient record.
- Content of a dashboard entry:
- A few essential informations intended to the coordination
of the emergency unit. Typically:
- Identification: patient ID number or at least a
case number, patient name,
- Primary responsible staff member taking charge of this
particular patient.
- Location of the patient: box number, and my be
currently moved to radiology,
- Urgency level, optional alarm icon and sound, in case a
monitoring device would raise an alarm, for example if a cardiac arrect.
- Summary ogf the main current problems.
- Summary of the currensituation of the action plan:
for example lab requested and waiting for results.
- ....
- Collaboration
issues:
- Nearly all patients are of course
new and not known in advance in the emergency unit:
- Access to a previouly well maintained up to date patient
record
should be very
desirable. An overview of the already known problems can help to
make safer and more quickly decisions.
- Required reports:
- Normally all patients are transferred within less than
about 2 hours. When the patient arrive by a new colleague it is
critical to have a report of all what was observed and done during the
stay in the emergency department. It is particularly critical if
the patient is admitted in a depetment of the hospital. If the
patient is discharged th GP should have access to the report the same
day.
- Other documents are less urgents, but it is efficient to
close a case completly when the patient is leaving. There is not
always time to do it immediately, but doing that work a few days later
would be more difficult and more time consuming.
- Approaches:
- The idea is to register the information once immediatly at
the source by the person getting the information. Having the
information in the computer it can be reused several time in order to
produce the various reports, as electronic messages and/or printer
documents.
- Most usual reports:
- Medical summary intended for the colleagues where the
patient is transferred.
- optional prescriptions if the patient may be discharged.
- Optional certificates for an employer or a school,
- Administrative declaration,
- Insurance documents,
- Classification code intended for the statistics.
- Access rigths:
- Normally the rule is that in order to get get access to any
personal patient record, one must be an agreed member of the care team
of the patient, with his/her explicit agreement.
- In practice emergency units need an exception, allowing the
doctor to declare himself to be a member of the care team of the
patient. However as a preventive measure, the list of such forced
accesses can be reviewed later for justification. Moreover the patient
should be informed afterwards of any forced access.